MODIFIED MUD BRICKS FOR STRENGTHENING HISTORIC EARTHEN STRUCTURES: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND GREEN RESTORATION

Document Type : research articles

Author

Restoration Dep, Faculty of Archaeology, Fayoum University

Abstract

The use of mud brick as an ancient building material reaches far back in the history of architecture. Mud bricks consist of clay and, sand, reinforced with plant fibers such as rice husks or straw. Mud bricks in most heritage buildings made of earth have suffered significant damage due to various causes.  The present research aims thus at maintaining the stability, the compatibility and the compressive strength of mud bricks without changing their historical characteristics. We verify the strengthening effectiveness and their compatibility to usage when applied on mud bricks. The experimental aspect of the research included the assessment of the physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of historical mud bricks and the identification of phenomena of internal deterioration. Furthermore, the paper proposes the use of nano- and waste- reinforced mud bricks in restorations processes of historical buildings. These have been tested using different innovative mixtures such as nano-kaolin, silica fume, and Homra (fired bricks’ dust), to increase the stability and durability of these mud bricks. All proposed mixtures were tested after 28 days of samples formation.  The properties of proposed mixtures for mud bricks gave satisfying and promising results for the use of nano- and waste-reinforced mud bricks in the strengthening and the reconstruction of historic earthen structures. In addition, mud bricks consisting of mud, straw, fine sifted sand, homra (fired bricks’ dust) provide a sustainable and green solution to restore historic earthen structures.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. REFERENCES

    1. Abdelmegeed M., Badogiannis E., Kotsovos G., Vougioukas E. (2014) “Assessment of physical and mechanical properties of historical and traditional masonry buildings: a case study” International journal of conservation science (IJCS) Volume 5, Issue 3, July-September 2014: 343-354  
    2. Abdelmegeed, M., Hassan, S. (2019) “Diagnostic investigation of decaying limestone in historical buildings at the Mamluks cemetery- city of the dead, Egypt” Egyptian Journal of Archaeological and Restoration Studies "EJARS", Volume 9, Issue 2, December - 2019: pp: 183-196
    3. Abdelmegeed, M., Kassab M., Shoukry H., & Taha S. 2019, Innovative Composite Materials for Strengthening Lime-based Mortars in Traditional Masonry Structures, stroitel‘nye materialym construction materials, 2019-773-8-42-47
    4. AlAjmi F., Abdalla H., Abdelghaffar M., Almatawah J. 2016, Strength behavior of mud brick in building construction, Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2016, 6, 482-494.
    5. Attia A., 2002, Study of the restoration and conservation of fired bricks historic buildings, applied on one of historical Roman buildings in Tall Elfarma, South Sinai, Master Thesis, restoration Dept, Faculty of archaeology, Cairo University, 2002, Pp 40: 48.
    6. Basta J. 1991, Composition of mud brick in construction of ancient Egyptian antiquities, PhD thesis, Ain-Shams University, 1991, Pp 4-18.
    7. Borri, A.; Casadei, P.; Castori, G.; Hammond, J., 2009, Strengthening of brick masonry arches with externally bonded steel reinforced composites. J. Compos. Constr, 2009, 13, 468-475.
    8. Borsoi G., Lubelli B., van Hees R., Veiga R., ntónio., 2017” Evaluation of the effectiveness and compatibility of Nanolime consolidants with improved properties” Construction and Building Materials 142 (2017) 385–394.
    9. Borsoi G., Tavares M., Veiga R., Santos A. 2012 “Microstructural characterization of consolidant products for historical renders: an innovative nanostructured lime dispersion and a more traditional ethyl silicate limewater solution” Microsc. Microanal. 18 (2012) 1181–1189.
    10. Cameron, C. (1998) “Coursed adobe architecture, style, and social boundaries in the American Southwest” In the archaeology of social boundaries, edited by Stark M., Washington Smithsonian institution press.183–208.
    11. Elgar, G. (2008) “The devolution of mud brick: Ethno- archaeology of abandoned earthen dwellings in the Bolivian Andes.” Journal of Archaeological Sciences 35: 3057–3071.
    12. Elgar, G., Bettencourt N., Conrey R. (2015) “Geochemical characterization of Bolivian formative earthen architecture by Wavelength-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence.” Geoarchaeology 30 (1): 32–58.
    13. El-Gohary M. “The Contrivance of new mud brick for restoring and preserving the Edfa ancient granary-Sohag, Egypt, IJCS, Vol. 3 (2), 2012.
    14. El-Gohary, M. (2016) “A holistic approach to the assessment of the groundwater destructive effects on stone decay in Edfu temple using AAS, SEM-EDX and XRD” Environ- Earth. Sci., Vol. 75 (13), pp: 1-11
    15. El-Gohary, M., (2010), Investigations of limestone weathering of El-tuba minaret El-Mehala, Egypt: a case study, MAA, Vol. 10 (1), pp: 61-79
    16. El-Kabbany M., 2013, Alternative Building Materials and Components for Affordable Housing in Egypt towards Improved Competitiveness of Modern Earth Construction, Master thesis, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Engineering and University of Stuttgart, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning. 2013, Pp. 34;38.
    17. Emery V. (2009) “Mud-Brick” In UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, edited by W. Wendrich. Los Angeles: eScholarship, 2009.
    18. Fathy H., 1973, Architecture for the Poor, an Experiment in Rural Egypt, Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
    19. Fitzner B. (2002) “Damage diagnosis on stone monuments-weathering forms, damage categories and damage indices” in: Viles, H. & 3Ĝikryl, R., (eds.) Understanding and managing of stone decay, Proc. of the Int. Conf. Stone Weathering and Atmospheric Pollution Network (SWAPNET 2001), Karolinum Press, Charles Univ., Prague, pp: 11-56.
    20. French, C. 1984. “Sediments analysis of mud brick and natural features at El-Amarna” In Amarna Reports I, edited by B. Kemp, London: Egypt Exploration Society.189–201.
    21. Grande E., Imbimbo M. & Sacco E., 2011, Bond behavior of historical clay bricks strengthened with steel reinforced polymers (SRP), Materials 2011, 4, 585-600.
    22. Hansen E., Doehne E., Fidler J., Larson J., Martin B., Matteini M., Sebastian E., Price P., de Tagle A., Teutonico J., Weiss N. 2003 “A review of selected inorganic consolidants and protective treatment for porous calcareous materials” Rev. Conserv. 4 (2003) 13–25.
    23. Homsher, R. (2012) “Mud bricks and the process of construction in the Middle Bronze age Southern Levant.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 368: 1–27.
    24. Ibrahim, M. A., 1987. Community participation in low income housing, s.l.: Ain Shams University.
    25. Kevin D. 2015, A field investigation of composite mud brick compressive strength, Master thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Pp. 1:3.
    26. Nodarou E, Frederick C., Hein A. (2008) “Another (mud) brick in the wall: scientific analysis of Bronze Age earthen construction materials from East Crete “Journal of Archaeological Science 35 (2008) 2997–3015.
    27. Serena L., (2017) “Field Methods for the Analysis of Mud Brick Architecture” Journal of field archaeology, 2017, Vol. 42, No. 4, 351–363.
    28. Warren J., 1999 (Conservation of bricks) first edition, Butterworth Heinemann, London, England, pp.  1-6.